You are currently browsing the monthly archive for October 2008.
E-Day Minus Four
Just a quick note tonight on McCain receiving a critical vote of confidence from Virginia\’s Elder Statesman, retiring Senator John Warner. This endorsement is a huge deal considering how widely respected John Warner is in Virginia, especially in spite of the general toxicity of the GOP brand. I myself like the man because he’s the rare republican that actually seems to have good reasons for holding positions I disagree with while knowing when to in turn disagree with the national party and the president. Or it would be were it not for the fact that there remain only 72 hours in the newscycle before E-Day and that’s not nearly enough time for something like this to sink in, especially with Obama up in Virginia to the tune of about 7 points. And Warner’s aforementioned sense of knowing when to break with the overall GOP is evident esp now; he seems to hail from the Colin Powell moderate camp and this has kept him from endorsing either candidate in Virginia’s Senate Race, which is another nail in the coffin for Jim Gilmore, who was already a deficient candidate on a number of levels. If I had to take a guess I’d say this endorsement was timed just so that he could say he endorsed McCain without it actually having much practical effect. This would allow him to still wield credibility and influence should he choose to play a role in the reshaping of the GOP that will follow the election no matter who wins.
E-Day Minus Five
Just a a quick and dirty tonight. My friend Brian over at Saint Superman has decided to enrage his lord and engage in a bit of electoral divination, and while my urge to follow suit is strong, I will forbear, for the following reasons:
The field of battleground states is ever-shifting. Just yesterday Real Clear Politics added Georgia to the tossup column, while several other sites have Arizona as being far too close to be a candidate’s home state. Meanwhile both Montana and North Dakota entered play within the last 7 days, and in this environment of electoral paradigms shifting without a clutch making any kind of prediction is akin to trying to forecast the weather in Virginia 24 hours in advance, a feat that has so far proven largely impossible. And this is to say nothing of the fact that the actual pollsters have far more data at their disposal and therefore a greater understanding of what’s actually driving the numbers, while most political laymen (myself mostly included) have little more to work with than the following tenets:
More Money = More Ads
Obama has 8 metric fucktons of both
Therefore, numbers will move in Obama’s direction.
It’s a crude measure, but so far seems to prove correct on at least the basic levels, and especially in a society as deeply ad-driven as our own. One only has to look as far as my last post for an example of this. But of course there are other, smaller, far more numerous factors doing their part to bump the numbers in various directions, and such minutiae (or at least lack of access to them) prevents us from making anytihng more than a GUESS.
Having said all that I would like to be able to claim a few “I told you so points”, so I’ll say a few words on what the future may hold: I wouldn’t be surprised to see either North Dakota or North Carolina fall into the Obama column, and while I’ll be keeping an eye on Georgia it’s probably gonna stay republican, as much as I might want to forecast aforementioned GOPocalypse. This is even more true in the case of Arizona, which is weakening but won’t flip entirely before E-Day. As the percieved holder of the national zeitgeist, I would also expect Missouri to slide into the Obama column. Ohio and Florida can and will do as they wishes, and will hopefully find themselves far less strategic weapons this time out. Either way I’d rather not touch them with 30 foot poles, but they both have taken on a blue tinge.
But all of this is essentially moot, as we’re no longer really discussing whether Obama will win, but how large the margin will be, which in turn will determine the extent of his mandate.
E-Day Minus Six
Well I couldn’t very well call myself a blogger if I ignored the single largest ad-buy in American political history, so despite a ten hour work day I bring myself before you to summarize the Obama superad.
The thing basically took the form of a string of Obama’s usual two-minute ads in which he goes into specifics on what he wants and how he’ll get/pay for it, peppered with scenes of him giving speeches/talking to avg ppl/tales of struggles of aforementioned everymen/obligatory chorus of praise from notable democrats, mostly governors. I counted Sebelius, Patrick, and Kaine (yay!), as well as Senator McCaskill. Also included were segments about him speaking on his past and present family life, all very uplifting if you’re into that sort of thing. Notable is that one of the “Tales of Everyman” centered on a teacher who is also the mother of a special-needs child, in what is a clear counter-shot to one of Sarah Palin’s big substantive policy pushes. The whole thing was capped off with a 5 minute speech broadcast live from Florida which essentially asked ppl to get out the vote.
As for policy specs, it was pretty much things those who have been following the campaign have already heard several times over, but then they’re not the target audience here. The superad is aimed at undecided voters, who generally ignore the campaign until the final week and then make up their minds several days (or possibly hours) before E-Day. It’s meant to reverse, or at least blunt, the late-decider tendency to break republican. This is critical as while Obama holds a commanding lead in most critical states, these states also have a significant proportion of undecideds remaining, and the leads he’s amassed could be either severely reduced or erased if they move towards McCain in large enough numbers.
For those who missed it, you didn’t miss you probably haven’t heard before if you’re even remotely political already. I myself would have skipped it had I not given myself the task of blogging about it, although I also prefer to view it myself before it moves through the prism of media coverage, and this brings us briefly to the superad’s final main objective: by it’s sheer length and expense it’ll dominate tomorrow’s news coverage even more than today, preventing McCain from gaining a narrative foothold for another day, even as he and Palin attempt to sell another alleged terrorist link to Obama.
And now having done my duty, I’ve been jonesing for a game by the name of Fallout 3, which posits a post-nuclear future that follows a McCain victory (I kid, I kid).
Aside: Seeing footage from Obama’s 04 Convention speech, it’s very noticeable the extent to which he’s aged in the interim.
E-Day Minus Seven
Firstly, in order to keep this thing going while I’m building up readership, I’ve issued myself a challenge: one post a day from now until Judgment Day, with the caveat of tomorrow as I know for a fact my job will be making me its bitch. But I need to keep soldiering on so I don’t get used to not writing.
Today’s topic: the rapidly approaching cataclysm for the Republican Party. Misfortune continues to rain down almost continuously on the GOP, much to the perverse pleasure of many (myself included). Aside from losing 5 senate seats being the best case scenario, along with at least 20 house seats, an atmosphere in the republicans must now contend with the conviction of Ted Stevens on corruption charges, who has decided to remain a candidate in the race for his senate seat despite now being almost certainly doomed. And of course Obama has expanded the playing field to such a degree that the GOP is now playing defense in such far flung reaches as Montana, as well as McCain’s lead in his home state of Arizona having dwindled to the point of hovering in the mid single digits. Let us not at this juncture even discuss what’s going on in Georgia, of all places, but suffice to say that there are few states left that can be described as solidly, unassailably republican.
And yet, in spite of the collapse of the electoral map on all three major fronts, the worst recent news for the GOP is the tales of palace intrigue coming out of the McCain campaign. Palin is apparently (understandably) displeased with the fact that the campaign mishandled her to the extent that her nationwide introduction became a miscarriage. She’s decided to handle herself, with the resulting tensions within the campaign now looking like the drawing of battle lines as Palin seeks to save herself to fight again in 2012. The result is the media on both sides reacting to what appears to be an almost complete implosion of the GOP. While the left now openly masturbates over the probable margins of Obama\’s victory, you can smell the whiskey coming off of the right’s lament of same.
And these are just some of the articles being written on the general topic that I will now broach. Palin is now obviously positioning herself to run in 2012, and the media is heavily speculating over Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee eventually following suit. With the conservative media establishment effectively split into what can roughly be described as pro- and anti-Palin factions, we are witnessing the battle lines being drawn and the early stages of the war for the soul of the republican party. Now, this is something we’ve all known was coming. Since 2006 bush’s poll numbers have only declined and the rest of the party along with him. The question that;s been asked about 2008 ever since has not been whether the republicans will be weakened, but how much? With one week left to go, we have a very clear answer: the result for them is going to range somewhere between disaster and FUBAR. With the public set to decisively repudiate everything the party has stood for for the last 8 years, to the point that there is open speculation about this being a realigning election and that the Reagan era may be dead, a period of soul searching has now become necessary. The question is who will prevail: Palin’s clean government, down home conservatism? Huckabee’s religious social conservatism? Or Romney’s economic conservatism? Some combination thereof? And, to the delight of liberals everywhere, is there a chance the rifts between the three could be so deep as to lead to a major split? These are among the questions that the GOP is going to have to deal with soon, as even in the unlikely event McCain ekes out a narrow victory the congress will still be overwhelmingly democratic.
The Republican Party is now at a critical crossroads. After being led very badly astray by the neoconservatives, it very quickly needs to remake itself into a form that an effective portion of the American electorate would actually be willing to vote for. What this form will be will depend on who prevails in the struggle to lead what now remains of the party, but for the time being one thing is clear: It’s a great time if you’re a democrat.
According to McCain campaign spokesman Nancy Pfotenhauer, while all my friends in Richmond and Charlottesville have been living it up in “real Virginia”, I’ve been living in a lie:
What I resent most here is the implication that all democrats in NoVa just moved down here from DC. I moved down here from New York, dammit! Seriously though, I begin to think the McCain campaign is TRYING to lose. When trying to win votes in a state maligning it’s major center of population is generally considered poor form. Combined with Joe McCain\’s assertion that Arlington and Alexandria are \”Communist Country\” it seems the McCain campaign holds some form of cognitive dissonance wherein the DC suburbs are not in fact part of Virginia but form a separate entity, the People’s Democratic Republic of Virginia, or “North Virginia”, if you will.
It seems that even after 34 years in congress democrat John Murtha has at least momentarily forgotten one of the unbreakable rules of politics: curse not thy voters. It’s doubtful this will create more than a headache for Murtha’s reelection effort at this point in the race. As to it’s effect on the national race, it’ll likely gain as much traction as the trial of Ted Stevens.
The Old Man once said “A house divided against itself cannot stand.” While this may have applied to the nation on the eve of civil war, the inverse is generally true in the context of the mechanism of American governance. Divided government fosters debate and compromise, the steady foundation upon which the Republic rests and is, at least in principle if not always in practice, a good thing.
Unless the president is George Bush.
Now, it is common knowledge among those who know me that I subscribe, along with about 65% of the nation on average, that the Bush presidency has been, if not an unmitigated disaster, a flat failure. The reasons for this are manifest and will not be enumerated at this time. What is material to the current discussion is that the president, and more to the point the neoconservative ideology he embodies, has exerted a warping influence on the workings of the federal government via the accelerated centralization of power in the executive branch. Many will argue that this has been a trend as old as the nation itself, and I do not deny this, I merely assert that this trend has been sped up under Bush to much ill-affect. I give the following example: the Democrats were swept into a congressional majority back in 2006 by effectively if not very skillfully harnessing the american people’s lust for the blood of the president and his party by promising to kick their collective ass, especially on Iraq. Unfortunately the resulting majority was small enough that on most issues Pelosi and Reid proceeded to fold faster than Superman on laundry day, with the resulting effect that congress finally outdid the president in that their approval rating has imploded even more spectacularly.
Now, as much as I love the idea on which divided government rests, I do not believe the results will necessarily be positive following this election cycle. This has as much to do with the candidates as with the current political climate, as I will now attempt to illustrate:
Let’s say McCain wins, despite this being an event that the political high priests, talking heads, and the average rabble have universally declared to be increasingly unlikely, the Bradley Effect aside. Should this occur, the task of effective governance will be made difficult if not impossible. At the moment, McCain is left with increasingly few effective lines of attack. Barring a terrorist attack, a massive screwup from the thus far almost flawlessly run Obama campaign, or President Bush revealing the formula by which water can be converted into gasoline, the GOP ticket is doomed. If the GOP and many of their remaining supporters are to be believed, McCain’s one hope is to enter the shadowlands from which Karl Rove even now beckons and cover Obama in a layer of filth so thick the American people won’t be able to help but turn away in disgust. While this may prove effective, it would violate McCain’s personal code of honor which he even now upholds despite a less than cooperative VP and campaign machine. More to the point, any victory garnered using this strategy would be immediately turned to ashes in the face of the fact that the Democrats are virtually guaranteed to increase their Senate majority by at least 4 seats if not more, thus allowing them to finally find their balls and effectively stonewall the republican president. McCain’s reputation for compromise in legislation having been cast aside in his mad quest for the Incredible Shrinking Republican Base, this scenario is grim to say the least.
In the case of an Obama victory, divided government is impossible due to aforementioned guarantee of Democratic conquest. Why this is a good thing, in my opinion, is that Obama has many policies I would like to see passed, and a healthy senate majority makes his task of governing easier, which is critical in the face of the many challenges we are currently presented with, the economy momentarily foremost among them.
However, make no mistake, there is a limit to my largesse towards the Democratic party. My relationship with them, at least at the congressional level, can currently be described as a marriage of convenience, and there is a significant part of me that wishes to see them gain a stronger majority that the Republicans might at last receive their due punishment of an election cycle or two in the wilderness. That being said, I do not want the Democrats to reach the magic 60 in the senate. For those unfamiliar with this particular golden number, 60 is the number of votes required to override a filibuster, basically allowing the majority party to cut off debate and steamroll the opposition. In fact, were it not for Mark Warner being so excellent and Jim Gilmore being so excellently detestable I might actually vote GOP in Virginia’s senate race. While I do wish to see much of the Democratic Party’s policies enacted, I do not want to give them the horrifying power that a supermajority entails. Having a majority of less than 60 forces the Democrats to work with moderate GOP members to get their work done, and I believe this will temper the more extreme policies they would otherwise see fit to unleash (immediate pullout from Iraq, anyone?). I may be liberal, but let it not be said I give the left free handjobs (and KeMiRo may take this opportunity to shut the hell up :P).
In the short term, I think our interests are best served by united government, a small part of the reason I’ll be voting for Obama. The Republicans, while they shouldn’t be ignored entirely, could use a few years as an actual minority to do some soul searching.
At least until 2010.
~We’re all in this together
It would seem that the Democrats are not immune from the contagion. While I take some comfort in the fact that the crowds who attend these rallies are incredibly partisan to begin with, the trend is nonetheless troubling.
You must be logged in to post a comment.